<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sound Philosophy? Is this philosophy of sounds sound?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deafphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/sound-philosophy-is-this-philosophy-of-sounds-sound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deafphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/sound-philosophy-is-this-philosophy-of-sounds-sound/</link>
	<description>a blog about everything and nothing at the same time                                      deafilosophy(AT)gmail.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 21:33:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: deafphilosophy</title>
		<link>http://deafphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/sound-philosophy-is-this-philosophy-of-sounds-sound/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>deafphilosophy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deafphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/sound-philosophy-is-this-philosophy-of-sounds-sound/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Both of you addressed a valid problem. If you can hear something, but cannot understand it, why is that called a hearing loss? When I wore hearing aids, people would always shout thinking it helps me hear. Yes, I could hear them more than I cared to, but if I can hear it, there&#039;s something more complex than just a hearing loss. I believe there is some sort of &quot;dyslexia&quot; of the hearing, they can hear perfectly, but the message gets scrambled up. It&#039;s also ironic that if something was really blasted in our ears, we would still not understand it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both of you addressed a valid problem. If you can hear something, but cannot understand it, why is that called a hearing loss? When I wore hearing aids, people would always shout thinking it helps me hear. Yes, I could hear them more than I cared to, but if I can hear it, there&#8217;s something more complex than just a hearing loss. I believe there is some sort of &#8220;dyslexia&#8221; of the hearing, they can hear perfectly, but the message gets scrambled up. It&#8217;s also ironic that if something was really blasted in our ears, we would still not understand it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://deafphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/sound-philosophy-is-this-philosophy-of-sounds-sound/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deafphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/sound-philosophy-is-this-philosophy-of-sounds-sound/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Blind people that I know wear sunglasses to cover up oddities in the appearance of their eyes, not to block out what little light they do see.

There is such a wide range of deafness -- in comparison with the first poster: I cannot hear a conversation at all...unless I have HA on, in which case I can understand most of it if I can see the people talking.  Is that deaf?  I say so, though I can fool a lot of hearing people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blind people that I know wear sunglasses to cover up oddities in the appearance of their eyes, not to block out what little light they do see.</p>
<p>There is such a wide range of deafness &#8212; in comparison with the first poster: I cannot hear a conversation at all&#8230;unless I have HA on, in which case I can understand most of it if I can see the people talking.  Is that deaf?  I say so, though I can fool a lot of hearing people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Boutcher</title>
		<link>http://deafphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/sound-philosophy-is-this-philosophy-of-sounds-sound/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Boutcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deafphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/sound-philosophy-is-this-philosophy-of-sounds-sound/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Opinion varies from deaf individual to deaf individual. o one is right or wrong. I consider myself profoundly deaf simply because I cannot hear the phone ringing or a normal spoken conversation. However, when wearing a hearing aid,
I can hear the sound of a normal conversation -- without udnerstanding what is spoken. Therefore, I am still deaf. If I could understand, that would be another story.

Jean Boutcher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opinion varies from deaf individual to deaf individual. o one is right or wrong. I consider myself profoundly deaf simply because I cannot hear the phone ringing or a normal spoken conversation. However, when wearing a hearing aid,<br />
I can hear the sound of a normal conversation &#8212; without udnerstanding what is spoken. Therefore, I am still deaf. If I could understand, that would be another story.</p>
<p>Jean Boutcher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
